Doctoral Research Skill in Insolvency Arbitration Research (DRSIAR2)Â
A Professional Specialized Skill Training Program by Indian Arbitration Institution (IAI)
Eligibility: Any Basic Qualification or any Formal Education with Masters and any research or work experience.
Total Fees: Rs. 9,500/-
(Everything Included from Admission, Course Fees and Delivery of Certificate, no additional Fees Apart from it)
Mode: Online
Study Material:Â Will be provided through Learning Dashboard/Portal
Learning Type: Self Paced
Duration:Â 3 Months (Preferably, but can be completed anytime as soon as you give the Exam)
Enrollment:Â Any Time, there is no Fixed Enrolment Date or Day. A candidate can choose any time and the enrolment will be processed real time.
Exam: One Online Exam, MCQ and Subjective Type Questions of 100 Marks. Passing Marks 40%. If unsuccessful, you can give additional two attempts.
Procedure: Fill the Apply Now Form → Pay the Requisite Amount of Fees by Clicking Pay Now Button → Then Click on Payment Confirmation button and fill the form with all the Details → Then login to the Dashboard.
The intersection of insolvency regimes and arbitral dispute resolution represents one of the most intellectually demanding, high-stakes areas in modern commercial jurisprudence. While international arbitration is fundamentally rooted in party autonomy, procedural flexibility, and private contractual justice, corporate insolvency laws are driven by mandatory statutory authority, collective creditor action, and public policy imperatives. When a corporate debtor subject to ongoing or prospective arbitration enters statutory insolvency, these two competing legal philosophies collide. The Doctoral Research Skill in Insolvency Arbitration Research (DRSIAR2), presented by the Indian Arbitration Institution (IAI), is an advanced, post-graduate research training certification designed to equip high-level researchers, scholars, and policy specialists with the doctrinal methodologies and interdisciplinary frameworks required to navigate and resolve these foundational frictions.
This program goes far beyond surface-level statutory summaries. It unpacks the deep structural tensions that emerge between arbitral tribunals and insolvency adjudicators. Candidates explore how universalist versus territorial insolvency models intersect with institutional arbitral frameworks like the ICC, SIAC, LCIA, and domestic tribunals. Key areas of investigation include the scope of statutory moratoria on arbitral claims, the arbitrability of pure insolvency disputes versus mixed claims, the survival of pre-insolvency arbitration agreements, and the legal status of cross-border restructuring plans on pending arbitral awards.
The curriculum is heavily research-centric. It focuses on training candidates in qualitative doctrinal analysis, empirical dispute tracking, comparative legal synthesis across major international jurisdictions, and the formulation of rigorous doctoral-level hypotheses. Participants examine how judicial bodies—such as Indian company law tribunals, the UK Supreme Court, the US Bankruptcy Courts, and European commercial courts—harmonize or diverge on the enforceability of awards rendered against stressed balance sheets.
By engaging with cutting-edge academic scholarship, complex mock problematics, and global policy working papers, candidates develop high-caliber research and drafting acumen. The DRSIAR2 serves as a definitive professional and scholarly incubator for candidates dedicated to producing authoritative doctoral theses, peer-reviewed monographs, international policy proposals, and specialized advisory briefs at the confluence of restructuring and private dispute adjudication.
The tentative modules are as follows and are subject to continuous updates based on guidelines issued by the IAI Board of Skill Studies:
Module 1: Epistemology of Insolvency and Arbitration: The Public Policy Paradigm
Jurisprudential conflict: Party autonomy in contract versus the in rem, collective nature of corporate insolvency.
The tension between universalism, territorialism, and decentralized dispute adjudication.
Arbitrability boundaries: Distinguishing core insolvency matters from arbitrable pre-insolvency debt claims.
Module 2: Doctrinal Methodologies for Doctoral Inquiries in Commercial Law
Framing research problems, literature reviews, and gap identification in ADR-restructuring jurisprudence.
Comparative doctrinal research: Analyzing UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.
Empirical research designs: Quantitative tracking of arbitral claims, delays, and recovery metrics in corporate restructuring.
Module 3: Statutory Moratoria, Automatic Stays, and Tribunal Jurisdiction
The impact of insolvency commencement: Legal status of pending arbitrations upon declaration of a moratorium.
Tribunal competence-competence versus statutory judicial injunctions against arbitral proceedings.
Counterclaims, set-offs, and mutual credit mechanisms in tribunal proceedings involving insolvent entities.
Module 4: Creditor Classifications, Resolution Plans, and Arbitral Claims
Treatment of unliquidated arbitral claims and pending awards as contingent operational or financial debt.
The "Clean Slate" doctrine: Extinguishment of arbitral claims upon approval of statutory corporate resolution plans.
Rights of subrogation, third-party guarantors, and non-debtor co-defendants in multi-party arbitrations.
Module 5: Cross-Border Insolvency, Recognition, and Global Arbitral Coordination
Coordination between cross-border insolvency proceedings (Chapter 11, UK Part 26A Schemes, European Insolvency Regulation) and international arbitral seats.
Recognition of foreign main proceedings and their extraterritorial injunctive effect on arbitral tribunals.
Parallel proceedings, anti-suit injunctions, and conflicts of jurisdiction between sovereign bankruptcy courts and arbitral forums.
Module 6: Enforceability of Awards Under the New York Convention vs. Insolvency Public Policy
Article V(2)(b) of the 1958 New York Convention: Public policy objections grounded in insolvency violations.
Enforcement priorities: Arbitral award creditors versus secured and operational statutory bankruptcy claimants.
Fraudulent conveyances, avoidance transactions, and challenges to collusive or suspect arbitral awards.
Module 7: Emerging Frontiers: Stressed Assets, Third-Party Funding, and ESG Restructuring
Third-party dispute funding (TPF) in distressed and insolvency-related arbitration.
Arbitration clauses within bilateral investment treaties (BITs) triggered by state regulatory actions during national banking or corporate crises.
Insolvency arbitration within sustainable transition, climate compliance liabilities, and infrastructure project concessions.
Module 8: Doctoral Thesis Formulation, Academic Publishing, and Policy Drafting
Structuring advanced doctoral dissertations, monograph proposals, and high-impact law review articles.
Academic peer review protocols, citation ethics, and primary source corroboration in cross-border dispute research.
Drafting legislative reform memos, institutional guidelines, and policy recommendations for international dispute institutions.
Corporate distress and financial restructuring are inevitable realities of international commerce. When an enterprise becomes distressed, its contractual dispute mechanisms rarely pause neatly; instead, multi-million-dollar arbitrations collide head-on with statutory bankruptcy courts. This produces severe legal uncertainty, conflicting judgments, and deadlocked recovery proceedings. Undertaking the DRSIAR2 program provides deep academic, analytical, and professional advantages by demystifying this highly technical interface.
First, this course cultivates elite research capability. Standard postgraduate degrees rarely delve into the granular mechanics where cross-border insolvency and international arbitration intersect. DRSIAR2 fills this void by teaching candidates how to frame doctoral-level research questions, evaluate contradictory cross-jurisdictional precedents, and conduct rigorous comparative legal analysis that commands academic respect.
Second, it bridges the gap between academic theory and practical enforcement. Understanding how a statutory moratorium affects a tribunal's mandate prevents the waste of institutional capital on unexecutable arbitral proceedings. Scholars and practitioners trained through this program can identify whether an arbitral claim will survive corporate restructuring or be extinguished by operation of law, adding immense strategic value to academic inquiries and institutional consultations.
Finally, the program positions participants at the forefront of policy reform. As multilateral organizations—including UNCITRAL, UNIDROIT, and regional arbitration institutions—actively seek frameworks to streamline distressed dispute resolution, researchers with this specialized training are uniquely qualified to lead legislative commentary, contribute to statutory drafting committees, and influence international institutional guidelines.
The advanced analytical rigor fostered by the DRSIAR2 opens distinct career pathways across higher education, policy research, corporate advisory, and international dispute administration.
Doctoral Candidates, Law Faculty, and University Researchers: Graduates are primed to pursue funded PhD programs, post-doctoral fellowships, or tenure-track academic appointments in commercial law, procedural jurisprudence, and corporate restructuring. The completed research portfolio and methodological training provide a significant competitive advantage when applying to top-tier international law schools and securing research grants.
Policy Fellows and Law Commission Analysts: Think tanks, national law commissions, multilateral development banks (such as the World Bank and ADB), and international bodies require research specialists to formulate comparative reports on ease of doing business, debt resolution, and alternative dispute mechanisms. DRSIAR2 holders possess the exact interdisciplinary research background to lead these initiatives.
Senior Research Associates in Dispute and Restructuring Practices: Tier-one domestic and international law firms maintain specialized knowledge management, research, and appellate briefing wings. Professionals with this qualification are equipped to prepare complex opinion memorandums, brief senior counsel on conflicting cross-border insolvency precedents, and craft arguments on the enforceability of awards against insolvent corporate groups.
Institutional Case Counsel and Arbitral Policy Officers: Arbitral institutions (such as SIAC, LCIA, and ICC) and insolvency regulatory authorities require specialized case analysts to handle institutional challenges involving corporate distress. Graduates can serve as institutional case counsel, procedural advisors, or legal officers managing tribunal queries regarding moratoria and tribunal jurisdiction.
The Indian Arbitration Institution has structured this doctoral skill program with transparent parameters, self-directed flexibility, and accessible digital learning protocols to accommodate the demanding schedules of advanced scholars and working professionals.
Eligibility To ensure participants possess the prerequisite foundational knowledge necessary to engage with advanced research materials, applicants must hold:
Any Basic Qualification or any Formal Education with a Master's Degree, alongside any relevant research or professional work experience.
This interdisciplinary standard welcomes Master's degree holders in Law (LL.M.), Commerce, Finance, Corporate Governance, Economics, or Public Policy, as well as practicing advocates, company secretaries, insolvency professionals, and independent researchers.
Total Fees The comprehensive program investment is Rs. 9,500/-. This single, transparent fee is completely all-inclusive, covering registration, institutional admission, complete access to the research portal, examination administration, and the physical printing and courier delivery of the hard-copy Certificate upon successful completion. There are no additional assessment fees, library subscriptions, or hidden charges.
Mode and Study Material The program is delivered entirely Online. Upon enrollment confirmation, candidates receive personalized login credentials for the dedicated Learning Dashboard/Portal. The Study Material comprises comprehensive doctoral-level research dossiers, international tribunal rulings, comparative statutory charts, reading guides, and seminal research monographs compiled by leading authorities.
Learning Type and Duration The program operates on a fully Self-Paced learning structure. While the recommended study duration is 3 Months to thoroughly review all eight modules and complete the independent readings, candidates have complete flexibility to study at their own pace and can take the certification examination as soon as they feel adequately prepared.
Enrollment Enrollment remains open Any Time throughout the year. There are no fixed intake dates, application windows, or academic semester cutoffs. Applications are verified and processed in real time, granting candidates immediate entry into the learning environment upon registration.
Examination Structure Certification is awarded based on performance in One Online Exam, comprising a balance of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) and in-depth Subjective Research/Analytical Questions totaling 100 Marks.
Passing Criteria: 40%
Retake Policy: In the event that a candidate does not meet the passing threshold on their initial attempt, the IAI grants up to two additional attempts at no supplementary fee.
Procedure
Apply: Complete the Apply Now Form on the official institutional portal.
Pay: Submit the requisite program fee of Rs. 9,500/- by clicking the Pay Now button.
Confirm: Click on the Payment Confirmation button and submit the verification form with the required transaction details.
Access Dashboard: Log into your personalized Learning Dashboard to access the research modules and initiate your study program.