A Professional Specialized Skill Training Program by Indian Arbitration Institution (IAI)
Eligibility: Any Basic Qualification or any Formal Education with Masters and any research or work experience.
Total Fees: Rs. 9,500/-
(Everything Included from Admission, Course Fees and Delivery of Certificate, no additional Fees Apart from it)
Mode: Online
Study Material: Will be provided through Learning Dashboard/Portal
Learning Type: Self Paced
Duration: 3 Months (Preferably, but can be completed anytime as soon as you give the Exam)
Enrollment: Any Time, there is no Fixed Enrolment Date or Day. A candidate can choose any time and the enrolment will be processed real time.
Exam: One Online Exam, MCQ and Subjective Type Questions of 100 Marks. Passing Marks 40%. If unsuccessful, you can give additional two attempts.
Procedure: Fill the Apply Now Form → Pay the Requisite Amount of Fees by Clicking Pay Now Button → Then Click on Payment Confirmation button and fill the form with all the Details → Then login to the Dashboard.
The Doctoral Research Skill in Arbitration Methodology (DRSAM2), offered by the Indian Arbitration Institution (IAI), is an advanced, postgraduate research training program engineered for scholars, legal practitioners, arbitrators, and policy analysts preparing for high-level doctoral inquiry (Ph.D., S.J.D., or LL.D.) and institutional reform in arbitration. As commercial and investment disputes become increasingly complex across cross-border jurisdictions, standard legal training is no longer sufficient. Modern dispute resolution demands robust research methodologies, empirical verification, comparative doctrinal analysis, and disciplined analytical rigor.
This curriculum bridges the divide between substantive arbitration law and academic research execution. Participants examine the core philosophical and methodological paradigms underpinning international commercial and investment treaty arbitration. From the foundational tenets of party autonomy, the doctrine of separability, and competence-competence, to the jurisdictional interfaces between arbitral tribunals and domestic courts, DRSAM2 teaches researchers how to identify structural friction points within existing statutory and procedural frameworks.
A major focus of the program is empirical and qualitative inquiry within dispute resolution systems. Scholars learn how to formulate defensible research questions, design empirical datasets examining arbitral award enforcement, analyze institutional case-flow data, and conduct systematic comparative legal evaluations across both civil and common law traditions. The program equips researchers with advanced literature synthesis strategies, specialized citation systems (Bluebook, OSCOLA), bibliometric indexing, and tools for navigating major international dispute archives, such as ICC, LCIA, SIAC, ICSID, and PCA case records.
Furthermore, the program addresses contemporary frontiers transforming arbitration jurisprudence: artificial intelligence in procedural administration and award drafting, third-party funding disclosures, transparency mandates in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), and challenges to arbitral award enforceability under the New York Convention. Under the institutional direction of the Indian Arbitration Institution, DRSAM2 cultivates the intellectual independence, methodological discipline, and scholarly writing proficiency necessary to publish peer-reviewed monographs, draft legislative reforms, and construct authoritative doctoral dissertations.
The tentative modules are as follows:
Module 1: Jurisprudential Foundations and Theoretical Frameworks of Arbitration
Epistemological and jurisprudential foundations of dispute settlement and international arbitration.
Theories of arbitration: jurisdictional, contractual, mixed/hybrid, and autonomous doctrines.
Party autonomy, arbitral authority, and public policy boundaries across legal traditions.
Formulating theoretical frameworks to ground empirical and doctrinal arbitration dissertations.
Module 2: Advanced Doctrinal and Comparative Legal Methodologies in Dispute Resolution
Comparative legal methodology: functional, structural, and historical methods in arbitration research.
Harmonization of arbitration laws: the UNCITRAL Model Law framework across civil and common law regimes.
Analyzing conflicting judicial precedents and cross-jurisdictional enforcement trends.
Statutory interpretation models and synthesis of judicial reasoning in domestic annulment proceedings.
Module 3: Empirical and Quantitative Research Methods in Arbitration Systems
Designing empirical studies: tracking arbitral caseloads, duration, and tribunal appointment demographics.
Quantitative data collection: building research codebooks, sampling court records, and statistical significance testing.
Empirical assessments of award annulment and enforcement rates under the 1958 New York Convention.
Navigating research confidentiality, ethical constraints, and party privacy in empirical inquiry.
Module 4: Qualitative Inquiry, Elite Interviewing, and Institutional Case Studies
Methodologies for qualitative arbitration research: process tracing, archival investigation, and case study design.
Designing and executing elite interviews: engaging arbitrators, institutional counsel, and commercial judges.
Qualitative coding frameworks: thematic analysis of arbitral deliberations and procedural orders.
Structural case studies of international arbitral institutions: ICC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, and institutional rule revisions.
Module 5: Research Design, Literature Review Architecture, and Gap Identification
Structuring the doctoral dissertation: drafting the core research problem, hypotheses, and scope limitations.
Constructing systematic literature reviews and conceptual matrices to isolate scholarly gaps.
Formulating interdisciplinary research bridges: law and economics, game theory, and behavioral psychology in settlement.
Writing competitive doctoral proposals, academic grant applications, and ethics review submissions.
Module 6: International Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform, and Sovereignty Research
Public international law research methods applied to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) and FTAs.
Jurisdictional methodology in investor-state arbitration under the ICSID Convention.
Critical research on ISDS legitimacy: appellate mechanisms, regulatory chill, and state sovereignty.
Empirical and normative evaluations of the UNCITRAL Working Group III reform proposals.
Module 7: Emerging Frontiers: AI, ODR, Third-Party Funding, and Procedural Ethics
Methodological approaches to studying algorithmic arbitration, automated awards, and procedural fairness.
Research frameworks for third-party funding: conflicts of interest, cost allocations, and systemic transparency.
Evidence collection and forensic data standards in cross-border digital arbitration environments.
Investigating ethical duties, arbitrator bias, and algorithmic accountability in dispute settlement.
Module 8: Scholarly Writing, Peer Review, Thesis Formulation, and Policy Drafting
Structuring high-impact law review articles, academic monographs, and doctoral theses.
Mastery of specialized legal citation regimes: Bluebook (21st ed.), OSCOLA, and citation management systems.
Managing journal submission workflows, peer-review rebuttals, and institutional research dissemination.
Translating academic research into legislative amendments, institutional rules, and judicial amicus briefs.
The Doctoral Research Skill in Arbitration Methodology (DRSAM2) provides the rigorous technical and theoretical bridge needed between professional dispute practice and terminal academic scholarship.
First, standard legal education primarily teaches how to apply existing law, not how to research, evaluate, and reform systemic legal structures. High-level academic evaluation, policy formulation, and doctoral research demand empirical methodologies, quantitative data validation, and interdisciplinary tools. This course trains researchers to conduct rigorous empirical studies rather than relying on unverified assumptions, giving their scholarly output genuine analytical authority.
Second, aspiring doctoral candidates frequently encounter delays or rejected proposals due to poor research design, imprecise problem statements, and weak methodological framing. DRSAM2 systematically resolves these hurdles. By mastering literature synthesis, hypothesis testing, comparative analysis, and academic writing, candidates produce well-structured, defensible research proposals that meet the rigorous standards of premier international universities.
Third, dispute resolution institutions, legislative bodies, and international economic organizations increasingly demand evidenced-based research to modernize institutional rules and statutory frameworks. Professionals skilled in evaluating dispute trends, award enforcement metrics, and cost structures are well-equipped to direct research divisions in arbitral institutions, shape bilateral treaties, and draft national legislative reforms.
Finally, completing a specialized methodology program accredited by the Indian Arbitration Institution validates high-level research proficiency. It distinguishes participants as subject-matter authorities capable of publishing in peer-reviewed arbitration journals, teaching specialized graduate programs, and leading institutional research initiatives worldwide.
The advanced analytical, empirical, and doctrinal research competencies acquired in the DRSAM2 program open diverse career pathways in academia, institutional dispute administration, and policy strategy:
Doctoral Researcher and Academic Fellow: Secure admissions and funded doctoral or postdoctoral research fellowships (Ph.D., S.J.D., Post-Doc) at leading global universities and specialized legal research centers.
University Professor and Arbitration Lecturer: Teach advanced Alternative Dispute Resolution, international commercial arbitration, comparative law, and legal research methodology within law faculties.
Institutional Research and Policy Director: Lead research divisions, policy desks, and rules revision committees within domestic and international arbitral institutions (such as IAI, SIAC, LCIA, or ICC).
Think-Tank Analyst and Legislative Advisor: Serve as a specialized researcher for law reform commissions, judicial academies, and international bodies (such as UNCITRAL or UNCTAD), drafting policy white papers and legislative amendments.
Specialized Arbitration Counsel and Case Strategist: Provide senior litigation teams and multinational corporations with research-backed strategy, identifying comparative legal arguments, jurisdictional precedents, and enforcement vulnerabilities across jurisdictions.
Arbitral Award Compliance and Risk Consultant: Conduct forensic and comparative analyses of arbitral proceedings to guide risk assessments, third-party litigation funding evaluations, and global enforcement proceedings under the New York Convention.
The Indian Arbitration Institution delivers the DRSAM2 program through an accessible, fully digital framework tailored to working professionals, practicing counsel, and full-time researchers.
Eligibility Applicants must hold:
Any Basic Qualification or Any Formal Education, combined with a Master’s Degree (in Law, Management, Public Policy, Social Sciences, or relevant disciplines) AND any prior research or work experience.
This requirement ensures participants possess the foundational academic discipline necessary to engage effectively with doctoral-level research design and comparative methodology.
Total Fees The comprehensive program fee is Rs. 9,500/-. This single payment covers every phase of the program: registration, verification of credentials, full access to the learning dashboard, all curated study manuals and reading compendiums, examination evaluation, and the physical printing and courier dispatch of the formal certificate. There are no supplementary fees, subscription charges, or hidden expenses.
Mode and Study Material The program is conducted completely Online. Admitted scholars receive direct access to the secure IAI Learning Dashboard/Portal. Complete Study Material—including theoretical monographs, research methodology guides, comparative statutory tables, research templates, citation manuals, and seminal case digests—is delivered directly through the portal.
Learning Type and Duration DRSAM2 operates as a Self-Paced research program. The recommended duration is 3 Months, allowing adequate time to thoroughly assimilate the research materials. However, candidates retain full control of their schedule: you may complete the syllabus at your own pace and appear for the online examination whenever you are ready.
Enrollment Enrollment remains open Any Time throughout the year. There are no fixed enrollment cycles, intake windows, or semester start dates. Every application is processed in real time, granting immediate access to the dashboard upon confirmation of payment.
Examination Structure The course concludes with One Online Exam carrying a total of 100 Marks:
Format: A balanced combination of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) and Subjective/Methodological Research Analysis Questions.
Passing Marks: 40%.
Re-attempt Policy: Candidates who do not achieve the passing mark on their first attempt are entitled to two additional attempts at no additional cost.
Step-by-Step Procedure
Fill out and submit the official Apply Now Form on the IAI website.
Pay the requisite program fee of Rs. 9,500/- by clicking the Pay Now button.
Click the Payment Confirmation button and complete the verification form with your transaction details.
Log into your assigned Learning Dashboard to begin the curriculum.